3.9 Article

Sea surface temperature pattern reconstructions in the Arabian Sea

期刊

PALEOCEANOGRAPHY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2005PA001162

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] Sea surface temperature (SST) and seawater delta(18)O (delta(18)O(w)) were reconstructed in a suite of sediment cores from throughout the Arabian Sea for four distinct time intervals ( 0 ka, 8 ka, 15 ka, and 20 ka) with the aim of understanding the history of the Indian Monsoon and the climate of the Arabian Sea region. This was accomplished through the use of paired Mg/Ca and delta(18)O measurements of the planktonic foraminifer Globigerinoides ruber. By analyzing basin-wide changes and changes in cross-basinal gradients, we assess both monsoonal and regional-scale climate changes. SST was colder than present for the majority of sites within all three paleotime slices. Furthermore, both the Indian Monsoon and the regional Arabian Sea mean climate have varied substantially over the past 20 kyr. The 20 ka and 15 ka time slices exhibit average negative temperature anomalies of 2.5 degrees - 3.5 degrees C attributable, in part, to the influences of glacial atmospheric CO(2) concentrations and large continental ice sheets. The elimination of the cross-basinal SST gradient during these two time slices likely reflects a decrease in summer monsoon and an increase in winter monsoon strength. Changes in delta(18)O(w) that are smaller than the delta(18)O signal due to global ice volume reflect decreased evaporation and increased winter monsoon mixing. SSTs throughout the Arabian Sea were still cooler than present by an average of 1.4 degrees C in the 8 ka time slice. These cool SSTs, along with lower delta(18)O(w) throughout the basin, are attributed to stronger than modern summer and winter monsoons and increased runoff and precipitation. The results of this study underscore the importance of taking a spatial approach to the reconstruction of processes such as monsoon upwelling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据