4.6 Article

Incorporation of flow injection analysis or capillary electrophoresis with resonance Rayleigh scattering detection for inorganic ion analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1110, 期 1-2, 页码 235-239

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.01.053

关键词

resonance Rayleigh scattering detection; capillary electrophoresis; flow injection analysis; iodide; basic rhodamine B dye; permanganate; dichromate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resonance Rayleigh scattering (RRS) has been explored as a detection (RRSD) technique for capillary electrophoresis (CE) or flow injection analysis (FIA) of inorganic ions. The detection was achieved through a scattering probe of ion-association complex formed from rhodamine B (Rh B) and iodine. The probe scatters strongly at 630 nm when oxidants such as Cr2O72-, MnO4- and ClO- present in a mixed solution of Rh B and iodide. The scattering disappears once iodine is reduced by reductants. Oxidant or reductant species in a sample can thus be detected by positive or negative RRS signal. To verify the RRSD, FIA-RRSD was first constructed and continuous measurement of testing samples containing Cr2O72-, MnO4- and/or ClO- was performed. The detection limits reached a level of decade nM and a linear range was found between peak height and concentration at the range of 0.255-2.04 mu M for Cr2O72-, 0.158-3.16 mu M for MnO4-, and 1.18-9.43 mu M for ClO-, with linear regression coefficients of all above 0.99. The run-to-run relative standard deviation of peak height was less than 3% (n = 6). CE-RRSD was then set up and studied, using a capillary of 75 mu m i.d. x 33 cm filled with a running buffer of 50 mM citrate and 25 mM Tris (pH 3.32) and worked under -12 kV at room temperature. The CE eluent was at-line conducted into a stream of rhodamine B and iodine flowing inner a wide tube by plugging the capillary outlet into the wide tube. Different mixtures prepared from Cr2O72-, MnO4- and ClO- were successfully separated and detected by the CE-RRSD. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据