4.6 Article

3D meso-scale fracture modelling and validation of concrete based on in-situ X-ray Computed Tomography images using damage plasticity model

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
卷 67-68, 期 -, 页码 340-352

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.002

关键词

Mesoscale modelling of concrete; In-situ X-ray Computed Tomography; Voxel hexahedron meshing; 3D image based modelling; Damage plasticity model

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB035901]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR14E080002]
  3. PhD Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [2013010111002]
  4. EPSRC UK [EP/J019763/1]
  5. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany
  6. EPSRC [EP/J019763/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J019763/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three-dimensional (3D) meso-scale finite element models of concrete based on in-situ X-ray Computed Tomography (XCT) images are developed and validated in this study. The micro-scale images from a Brazilian-like XCT test are first compressed and then transformed into manageable meso-scale 3D meshes using a voxel hexahedron meshing technique with a stacking algorithm. The continuum damage plasticity model is used to simulate complicated damage and fracture behaviour. Excellent qualitative agreement is found between modelling and the XCT compression test in terms of damage evolution and fracture process on both the surface and interior of the specimen. 3D uniaxial tension tests are also simulated, and it is found that the distribution of voids have profound influences on the strength and crack patterns. The image-based 3D models are proved very promising in elucidating fundamental mechanisms of complicated crack initiation and propagation behaviour that 2D studies are incapable of modelling. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据