4.3 Article

Disease outcomes and ovarian function of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

LUPUS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 198-206

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1191/0961203306lu2291oa

关键词

children; cyclophsophamide; damage; gonadal function; POF; prognosis; SLE

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [P60 AR47784] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to determine the medical outcomes including the ovarian function childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). The medical records of all patients diagnosed with cSLE in the Greater Cincinnati area between 1981 and 2002 were reviewed. Patient interviews were performed to obtain additional information on current medication regimens, disease activity [ SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI-2k)], and damage [ Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index ( SDI)]. The occurence of premature ovarian failure (POF) and reduction of the ovarian reserve was assessed by timed gonadotropin levels. There were 77 patients ( F : M = 70 : 7, 53% Caucasian, 45% African-American and 2% Asian) with a mean age at diagnosis of 14.6 years. Nine patients died (88.3% survival) during the mean follow-up of 7.1 years ( standard deviation [SD] 5.6) and 88% of the patients continued to have active disease (SLEDAI-2k mean/ SD: 6.6/6.7), with 42% of them having disease damage ( SDI mean/ SD: 1.62/2.1); Non-Caucasian patients had higher disease activity ( mean SLEDAI-2k: 10 versus 3.4; P < 0.0001) and more disease damage ( mean SDI : 2.1 versus 1.2; P < 0.02) than Caucasian patients. Cyclophosphamide was given to 47% of the patients during the course of their disease and associated with the presence of significantly reduced ovarian reserve (RR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.7 - 4.8; P = 0.026). Patient mortality and disease damage with cSLE continue to be high. Although overt POF with cyclophosphamide exposure is rare, it is a risk factor for significantly decreased ovarian reserve cSLE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据