4.6 Article

The impact of overt and subclinical hyperthyroidism on skeletal muscle

期刊

THYROID
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 375-380

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2006.16.375

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Patients with overt hyperthyroidism (OH) commonly have proximal limb Muscle weakness that improves after correction of hyperthyroidism. It is unclear, however, if patients with milder degrees of hyperthyroidism (referred to as subclinical hyperthyroidism or SCH) may also have a degree of muscle weakness. This may have clinical relevance as SCH patients are often elderly and may therefore have concurrent sarcopenia of aging and would represent a previously unrecognized complication of SCH. Design: We measured both thigh strength and cross-sectional area in patients with OH (n = 30) or SCH (n = 24), both prior to treatment of hyperthyroidism and again at 6-9 months after the restoration of a euthyroid state. Euthyroid controls (n = 48) were studied at similar time intervals. Main outcome: Prior to treatment, both knee flexor and extensor muscle strength was reduced in both patients with OH and SCH compared to controls (p < 0.05). After treatment all strength measurements improved in the OH group (p < 0.01) while in the SCH group the majority of muscle strength measurements improved (p < 0.05). Midthigh muscle cross-sectional area was reduced in both the OH and SCH group at baseline (p < 0.05) compared to controls and increased significantly following treatment (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in any parameter in the euthyroid control (EC) group during the study period. Conclusions: The finding that muscle strength and cross-sectional area are reduced in SCH and improved after treatment lends support for the clinical decision to treat rather than observe this condition. This may have particular relevance to certain SCH patient groups including the elderly who are prone to falls and athletically active younger patients who require optimal skeletal muscle function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据