4.6 Article

Tuberculosis screening in migrants in selected European countries shows wide disparities

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 801-807

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00104305

关键词

Europe; screening; tuberculosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Well-established tuberculosis screening units in Western Europe were selectively sampled. Three screening units in Norway, two in the UK, one in the Netherlands and one in Switzerland were evaluated. The aim of this study was to describe a range of service models used at a number of individual tuberculosis units for the screening of new entrants into Europe. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians, nurses and administrators from a selected sample of European tuberculosis screening units. An outline of key themes to be addressed was forwarded to units ahead of scheduled interviews. Themes included the history of the unit, structure, processes and outputs involved in screening new entrants for tuberculosis. Considerable variation in screening services exists in the approaches studied. Units are sited in transit camps or as units within hospital facilities. Staff capacity and administration varies from one clinic per week with few dedicated staff to fully dedicated units. Only one site recorded symptoms; tuberculin testing was universal in children, but varied in adults; chest radiograph screening was universal except at one site where a positive tuberculin skin test or symptoms were required in those < 35 yrs of age before ordering a radiograph. Few output data are routinely and systematically collected, which hinders comparison and determination of effectiveness and efficiency. Service models for screening new immigrants for tuberculosis appear to vary in Western Europe. The systematic collection of data would make international comparisons between units easier and help draw conclusions that might usefully inform service development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据