4.2 Article

Non-Hertzian approach to analyzing mechanical properties of endothelial cells probed by atomic force microscopy

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.2165690

关键词

cell mechanics; stress fibers; actin cytoskeleton

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [F32-GM019756] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detailed measurements of cell material properties are required for understanding how cells respond to their mechanical environment. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is an increasingly popular measurement technique that uniquely combines subcellular mechanical testing with high-resolution imaging. However; the standard method of analyzing A FM indentation data is based on a simplified Hertz theory that requires unrealistic assumptions about cell indentation experiments. The objective of this study was to utilize an alternative pointwise modulus approach, that relaxes several of these assumptions, to examine subcellular mechanics of cultured human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs). Data from indentations in 2- to 5-mu m square regions of cytoplasm reveal at least two mechanically distinct populations of cellular material. Indentations colocalized with prominent linear structures in AFM images exhibited depth-dependent variation of the apparent pointwise elastic modulus that was not observed at adjacent locations devoid of such structures. The average pointwise modulus at an arbitrary indentation depth of 200 nm was 5.6 +/- 3.5 kPa and 1.5 +/- 0.76 kPa (mean +/- SD, n=7) for these two material populations, respectively The linear structures in AFM images were identified by fluorescence microscopy, as bundles of f-actin, or stress fibers. After treatment with 4 mu M cytochalasin B, HAECs behaved like a homogeneous linear elastic material with an apparent modulus of 0.89 +/- 0.46 kPa. These findings reveal complex mechanical behavior specifically associated with actin stress fibers that is not accurately described using the standard Hertz analysis, and may impact how HAECs interact with their mechanical environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据