4.6 Article

ICP27 interacts with the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II and facilitates its recruitment to herpes simplex virus 1 transcription sites, where it undergoes proteasomal degradation during infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 80, 期 7, 页码 3567-3581

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.80.7.3567-3581.2006

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI021515, AI21515, R37 AI021515] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) ICP27 has been shown to interact with RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) holoenzyme. Here, we show that ICP27 interacts with the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA-P II and that ICP27 mutants that cannot interact fail to relocalize RNAP H to viral transcription sites, suggesting a role for ICP27 in RNAP II recruitment. Using monoclonal antibodies specific for different phosphorylated forms of the RNAP H CTD, we found that the serine-2 phosphorylated form, which is found predominantly in elongating complexes, was not recruited to viral transcription sites. Further, there was an overall reduction in phosphoserine-2 staining. Western blot analysis revealed that there was a pronounced decrease in the phosphoserine-2 form and in overall RNAP II levels in lysates from cells infected with wild-type HSV-1. There was no appreciable difference in cdk9 levels, suggesting that protein degradation rather than dephosphorylation was occurring. Treatment of infected cells with proteasome inhibitors MG-132 and lactacystin prevented the decrease in the phosphoserine-2 form and in overall RNAP II levels; however, there was a concomitant decrease in the levels of several HSV-1 late proteins and in virus yield. Proteasomal degradation has been shown to resolve stalled RNAP II complexes at sites of DNA damage to allow 3' processing of transcripts. Thus, we propose that at later times of infection when robust transcription and DNA replication are occurring, elongating complexes may collide and proteasomal degradation may be required for resolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据