4.3 Review

Role of efaproxiral in metastatic brain tumors

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 477-485

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/14737140.6.4.477

关键词

allosteric modifer; brain metastases; deoxynucleic acid; efaproxiral; motexafin gadolinium; oxygen-hemoglobin dissociation curve; radiosensitizer; reactive oxygen species; RSR 13; whole-brain radiation therapy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain metastases from breast cancer are common and cause significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment with whole-brain radiotherapy provides a median survival of only 4-6 months. One mechanism affecting sensitivity to radiation is tumor oxygenation. Hypoxic tumor cells are more likely to be resistant to radiation and adversely affect prognosis. For nearly 70 years, all attempted modalities have failed to circumvent tumor hypoxia and increase tumor death. Abraham and colleagues developed a fibric acid derivative that would cause the displacement of oxygen from hemoglobin and improve tissue oxygenation. After modifications to enhance absorption into the red blood cell, RSR13 (etaproxiral) was developed. Efaproxiral was found to be safe and improved tumor oxygenation in preclinical studies. Early Phase I and II trials supported the earlier preclinical evidence while demonstrating that efaproxiral was safe and effective. A randomized Phase III study, Radiation Enhancing Allosteric Compounds of Hypoxic brain metastases (REACH, RT-009), failed to show a significant improvement in overall survival in all eligible patients treated with efaproxiral and whole-brain radiation. However, there was a statistically significant improvement in median survival and quality of life within a subset of metastatic breast cancer patients. Efaproxiral is currently being studied with radiotherapy in a confirmatory trial in the treatment of brain metastases from breast cancer. Furthermore, the combination of efaproxiral with radiotherapy is being investigated in other solid tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据