4.6 Article

Concanavalin-A reports agonist-induced conformational changes in the intact GluR6 kainate receptor

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 572, 期 1, 页码 201-213

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.103580

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH62144, R01 MH062144] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The agonist-binding domain of ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) has recently been crystallized as two polypeptide chains with a linker region. Although work on the structure of this isolated ligand-binding core has been invaluable, there is debate over how it relates to conformations adopted by intact receptors. iGluR crystals are proposed to represent the activated state as their degree of domain closure correlates well with agonist efficacy. However, iGluR crystals exhibit high agonist affinity that more closely matches that of desensitized receptors. Consequently, conformations adopted by iGluR crystals may represent this state. To test this, we have employed the plant lectin, concanavalin-A (Con-A) to report conformational changes elicited by kainate (KA) iGluR agonists during desensitization. When GluR6 KA receptors (KARs) were pre-incubated with Con-A, equilibrium responses evoked by the full agonist, L-glutamate (L-Glu), increased almost 30-fold. However, in the continued presence of L-Glu, Con-A exerted no effect suggesting that it has restricted access to its binding sites when the agonist is bound. However, Con-A does not discriminate well between agonist-bound or -unbound states with the weak partial agonist, domoate. Accessibility experiments with KA were intermediate in nature consistent with its equilibrium efficacy at GluR6 KARs. Our results suggest that full and partial agonists elicit distinct conformational changes in KARs during desensitization. This finding can be reconciled with crystallographic data if the agonist-binding domain adopts the same conformation in the activated and desensitized states. However, other interpretations are possible suggesting future work is required if this issue is to be resolved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据