4.2 Article

Relationship between cerebral vasomotor reactivity and white matter lesions in elderly subjects without large artery occlusive disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 120-125

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00030.x

关键词

acetazolamide; asymptomatic; cerebral vasomotor reactivity; white matter lesions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose. The relationships between cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) and white matter lesions (WMLs) were investigated mainly in patients with carotid stenosis. We aimed to study the relationship in asymptomatic elderly subjects without large artery occlusive disease. Methods. A total of 33 elderly individuals (mean age was 76.2 years) who were free from neurological deficit or cognitive impairment were studied. Bilateral mean blood flow velocity was measured in the middle cerebral artery using a 2-MHz pulsed transcranial Doppler (TCD) system together with intravenous administration of acetazolamide as vasodilatory stimuli. WMLs on a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence of MRI were classified into two categories: subcortical deep white matter hyperintensity (SDWMH) and periventricular hyperintensity (PVH). The lesions in each category were then divided into three grades (grade 0-I, grade II, grade III) according to the Fazekas scale. Results. CVR was inversely associated with the extent of SDWMH and PVH. The differences in CVR were statistically significant among different severity of WMLs: for SDWMH (70%+/- 10% in grade 0-I, 60%+/- 10% in grade II, and 40%+/- 10% in grade III, P < .001); for PVH (80%+/- 10% in grade 0-I, 60%+/- 10% in grade II, and 40%+/- 10% in grade III, P < .001). Conclusions. Impaired CVR is related to the extent of WMLs in asymptomatic elderly individuals without large artery stenosis. The findings in our study suggest that dysfunction of cerebral vascular autoregulation might be an important factor in the development of WMLs in the asymptomatic elderly without large artery occlusive disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据