4.7 Article

HBV DNA and HBsAg Levels as Risk Predictors of Early and Late Recurrence after Curative Resection of HBV-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 2429-2435

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3621-x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that high hepatitis B virus (HBV) load is associated with increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The aim of our study was to investigate the predictive role of HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in early and late recurrence of HCC after curative resection in patients with HBV-related HCC. From January 2008 to December 2010, a total of 248 patients underwent curative resection for HBV-related early-stage HCC (solitary tumor; < 5 cm in diameter or multinodular tumor; number of tumors a parts per thousand currency sign3 and diameter < 3 cm). We analyzed the predictive factors including HBV DNA and HBsAg levels for early recurrence (within 2 years) and late recurrence (after 2 years) of HCC after curative resection. The median follow-up duration was 33.3 months. Cumulative recurrence rates after resection at 1, 3, and 5 years were 16.6, 34.0, and 46.7 %, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for early recurrence were the presence of microvascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR] 3.86; p < 0.001), preoperative HBV DNA levels a parts per thousand yen 20,000 IU/mL (HR 2.77; p < 0.001), and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin level a parts per thousand yen 40 mAU/mL (HR 1.76; p = 0.045). Although, the risk factors for late recurrence by multivariate analysis were preoperative HBsAg levels a parts per thousand yen 4,000 IU/mL (HR 2.80; p = 0.023) and age at resection a parts per thousand yen 50 years (HR 3.22; p = 0.032). The HBV DNA levels were associated with early recurrence, whereas HBsAg levels were associated with late recurrence after curative resection in HBV-related HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据