期刊
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 275-278出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.02.016
关键词
ethics committees; multicenter study; survey methodology
资金
- NCI NIH HHS [1R01CA90323] Funding Source: Medline
OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the variability in requirements among six institutional review boards (IRBs) and the resulting protocol variations for a multicenter mailed survey. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We utilized a cross-sectional mailed Survey to gather information on long-term psychosocial outcomes of prophylactic mastectomy among women at six health maintenance organizations, all of which are part of the Cancer Research Network. In the context of this collaborative study, we characterized the impact of the different sites' IRB review processes on the study protocol and participation. RESULTS: IRB review resulted in site differences in physician consent prior to participant contact, invitation letter content and signatories, and incentive type. The review process required two to eight modifications beyond the initial application and resulted in unanticipated delays and costs. CONCLUSION: Site-to-site variability in IRB requirements may adversely impact scientific rigor and delay implementation of collaborative Studies, especially when not considered in project planning. IRB review is an essential aspect of research but one that can present substantial challenges for multicenter studies.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据