4.6 Article

Expression of the adaptor protein hematopoietic Src homology 2 is up-regulated in response to stimuli that promote survival and differentiation of B cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 176, 期 7, 页码 4163-4172

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.7.4163

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [T32 AI007051] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analysis of hematopoietic Src homology 2 (HSH2) protein expression in mouse immune cells demonstrated that it is expressed at low levels in resting B cells but not T cells or macrophages. However, HSH2 expression is up-regulated within 6-12 h in response to multiple stimuli that promote activation, differentiation, and survival of splenic B cells. HSH2 expression is increased in response to anti-CD40 mAb, the TLR ligands LPS and CpG DNA, and B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), a key regulator of peripheral B cell survival and homeostasis. Stimulation of B cells with anti-CD40 mAb, LPS, CpG DNA, or BLyS has previously been shown to induce activation of NF-kappa B. In agreement with this finding, up-regulation of HSH2 expression in response to these stimuli is blocked by inhibitors of NF-kappa B activation and is potentiated by stimulation with PMA, suggesting that HSH2 expression is dependent on NF-kappa B activation. In contrast to CD40, BAFF receptor, TLR4, and TLR9 mediated signaling, stimulation of splenic B cells via the BCR was not observed to induce expression of HSH2 unless the cells had been stimulated previously through CD40. Finally, HSH2 expression is down-regulated in splenic B cells in response to stimulation with IL-21, which has been shown to induce apoptosis, even in the presence of anti-CD40 mAb, LPS, or CpG DNA. IL-21 stimulation also results in down-regulation of antiapoptotic proteins such as Bcl-X-L and up-regulation of proapoptotic proteins like Bim. Therefore, HSH2 expression is coordinately up-regulated with known antiapoptotic molecules and directly correlates with B cell survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据