4.5 Article

Ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction: A 20-year community study

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 151, 期 4, 页码 806-812

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL59205] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR30582] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Although myocardial infarction (MI) severity is declining, the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) after MI and its effect on outcome is unknown. This study was undertaken to examine the frequency and timing of VA and the effect of VA on mortality after MI. Methods Myocardial infarctions recorded between 1979 and 1998 were validated. Baselin characteristics, occurrence of VA, and survival were determined. Ventricular arrhythmias were categorized as primary ventricular fibrillation (VF), nonprimary VF, and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Logistic regression was used to analyze associations between VA and baseline characteristics. Temporal trends were assessed with the Mantel-Haenszel chi(2). Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between death and occurrence of VA. Results Among 2317 persons with incident MI, 7.5% experienced VA (3.6% nonprimary VF, 2.1% primary VF, 1.8% VT). Ventricular arrhythmia-associated factors were younger age, female sex, higher Killip class, ST elevation, and atrial fibrillation. Ventricular arrhythmias were associated with increased risk of death at 30 days. Conclusions Ventricular arrhythmias after MI are relatively common, particularly among persons with more severe MI and no prior history of coronary disease. Over time, the incidence of VF declined, whereas VT did not change. Ventricular arrhythmia after MI was associated with a 6-fold increase in morality. Thus, identification of high-risk MI survivors and prevention of VA could markedly improve outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the cause of the shift in distribution of VA subtype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据