4.7 Article

Blood Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio is Prognostic in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 593-599

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2682-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [CA102613]
  2. Geoffrey Beene Cancer Research Center
  3. J. H. L. Pit and Mrs. Pit-van Karnebeek
  4. Dutch GIST Foundation
  5. Swim Across America (RPD)
  6. GIST Cancer Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immune system has been shown to play an important role in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in blood is an easily assessable parameter of systemic inflammatory response. The aim of this study was to determine whether the NLR is prognostic in GIST. A total of 339 previously untreated patients with primary, localized GIST operated at our institution between 1995 and 2010 were identified from a prospectively collected sarcoma database. NLR was assessed preoperatively. Patients who received adjuvant imatinib treatment were excluded from the analysis (n = 64). Cox regression models were calculated and correlation analyses were performed. On univariate analysis, NLR was associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.003, hazard ratio 3.3, 95 % confidence interval 1.5-7.4). Patients with a low NLR had a 1- and 5-year RFS of 98 and 91 %, compared with 89 and 76 % in those with a high NLR. The median RFS was not reached. Positive correlations were found between NLR and mitotic rate (Pearson correlation coefficient [r] = 0.15, P = 0.03), and NLR and tumor size (r = 0.36, P = 0.0001). RFS in patients with a GIST > 5 cm with low NLR was significantly longer compared to patients with high NLR (P = 0.002). Flow cytometry analysis of freshly obtained GISTs revealed that neutrophils constituted a minimal percentage of intratumoral immune cells. NLR is a surrogate for high-risk tumor features. Elevated blood NLR appears to represent systemic inflammation in patients with high-risk GIST.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据