4.7 Article

Microvascular Invasion Does Not Predict Long-Term Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma up to 2 cm: Reappraisal of the Staging System for Solitary Tumors

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 1223-1229

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2739-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health through Cancer Center Support Grant [CA016672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excellent long-term outcomes have been reported recently for patients with small (a parts per thousand currency sign2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the significance of microvascular invasion (MVI) in small HCC remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of MVI in small HCC up to 2 cm. In 1,109 patients with solitary HCC from six major international hepatobiliary centers, the impact of MVI on long-term survival in patients with small HCC (a parts per thousand currency sign2 cm) and patients with tumors larger than 2 cm was analyzed. In patients with small HCC, long-term survival was not affected by MVI (p = 0.8), whereas in patients with larger HCC, significantly worse survival was observed in patients with MVI (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, MVI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.27-1.99; p < 0.001), elevated alpha-fetoprotein (HR 1.41; 95 % CI 1.11-1.8; p = 0.005), and higher histologic grade (HR 1.29; 95 % CI 1.01-1.64; p = 0.04) were significant predictors of worse survival in patients with HCC larger than 2 cm but were not correlated with long-term survival in small HCC. When the cohort was divided into three groups-HCC a parts per thousand currency sign2, > 2 cm without MVI, and HCC > 2 cm with MVI-significant between-group survival difference was observed (p < 0.0001). Small HCC is associated with an excellent prognosis that is not affected by the presence of MVI. The discriminatory power of the 7th edition of the AJCC classification for solitary HCC could be further improved by subdividing tumors according to size (a parts per thousand currency sign2 vs. > 2 cm).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据