4.6 Article

HIV-related sexual behaviour among migrants and non-migrants in a rural area of China: Role of rural-to-urban migration

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 120, 期 4, 页码 339-345

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.10.016

关键词

migrants; non-migrants; sexual risk behaviour; HIV infection; china

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-retated sexual risks between temporary rural-to-urban migrants and non-migrants, and to explore the rote of migration in HIV transmission in a rural area of China. Study design: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 605 (302.5 couples, one mate missing) marriage licence applicants. Methods: A two-part anonymous questionnaire was used. The first part included nonsensitive questions including demographics and HIV knowledge. Sensitive questions related to sexual behaviours were administered in the second part of the questionnaire using a tape recorder, earphones and an answer sheet. Results: Sixty-six percent (399/605) of the study subjects had migrated to a city for a temporary job. The proportions of migrants who had, premarital sex (62%, 247/399) and multiple sexual partners (12%, 47/399) were significantly higher than those of non-migrants (52 and 6%, respectively). Among those who had multiple sexual partners, only 9% (4/47) of migrants and 8% (1/12) of non-migrants reported often or always using condoms with sexual partners other than their spouse. A tow level of knowledge regarding HIV and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome was observed in both groups. Very few migrants (15%, 61/399) and non-migrants (10%, 20/206) perceived themselves to be at risk of HIV infection. Conclusions: As both migrants and non-migrants are at risk of HIV infection, intervention programmes targeting reduction of HIV sexual risk behaviour should cover both groups in rural areas of China. (c) 2005 The Royal Institute of Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据