4.3 Article

Clinical and electroencephalographic study of first-degree relatives and probands with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

期刊

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 177-183

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.12.011

关键词

juvenile myoclonic epilepsy; first-degree relative; EEG; idiopathic generalized epilepsy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is a common, well-defined epileptic syndrome. This study aims to examine the clinical and EEG features of probands with JME and to identify the incidence of different types of idiopathic generalized epitepsies (IGEs) and IGE trait in first-degree relatives. Methods: Clinical and EEG data were collected from 132 first-degree relatives and 31 probands with JME. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square test, t-test and ANOVA. Results: All probands had a history of generalized tonic clonic seizures (GTCS) and myoclonic jerks; 25.8% had a history of absence seizures. Family history of epilepsy was noted in 42% and epilepsy in first-degree relatives was reported in 38.7%. We found JME in 44% of the symptomatic first-degree relatives. The incidence of epilepsy was higher in siblings (19%) than in offspring (8%) or parents (4%), the difference between the groups being significant (p < 0.05). IGE trait was noted in 6% of the asymptomatic first-degree relatives. Finally, IGE features were found in 61%. Subjects with IGE features were younger (mean age 19.6 years) than those without IGE features (mean age 32.4 years) and the difference between the groups was significant. Conclusion: The incidence of different kinds of IGEs and typical EEG trait is high in first-degree relatives of JME probands. IGE features were noted in 61% of the families. JME is the most common type of IGE and IGE features were found to be more frequent among siblings than parents. These findings confirm familial susceptibility to IGE. (c) 2006 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据