4.4 Review

The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria - What did they really say?

期刊

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 202-220

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1094428105284919

关键词

cutoff criteria; citation analysis; goodness of fit; reliability; factor analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Everyone can recite methodological urban legends that were taught in graduate school, learned over the years through experience publishing, or perhaps just heard through the grapevine. In this article, the authors trace four widely cited and reported cutoff criteria to their (alleged) original sources to determine whether they really said what they are cited as having said about the cutoff criteria, and if not, what the original sources really said. The authors uncover partial truths in tracing the history of each cutoff criterion and in the end endorse a set of 12 specific guidelines for effective academic referencing provided by Harzing that, if adopted, should help prevent the further perpetuation of methodological urban legends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据