4.5 Article

Thymidine phosphorylase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase mRNA expression in primary colorectal tumors -: correlation to tumor histopathology and clinical follow-up

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 238-247

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-005-0767-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Evaluation of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and thymidylate synthase (TS) mRNA levels in formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded tissues of patients with colorectal cancer and their prognostic and/or predictive value. Materials and methods: Total RNA was isolated from microdissected, formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded tissues (controls and tumor) and subjected to quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR) in the LightCycler system. Resulting mRNA levels correlated to tumor histology (n=102) and the clinical follow-up in patients treated by resection alone (n=40) and by resection plus adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy (n=52). Results: Correlation to histopathological parameters revealed a significant association between tumor stage and the TP mRNA level (T and N category and UICC) as well as the TP:DPD (T and N category and UICC) and TS:DPD (T category) ratio. In addition, tumor differentiation was correlated to the TS mRNA level and the TS:DPD ratio. Finally, the TS:DPD ratio was a prognostic marker for overall survival in patients receiving resection alone (p=0.032). Moreover, a high TP:DPD ratio (> 8.1; p=0.002) and, marginally, low DPD (< 8.2; p=0.05) mRNA levels significantly correlated to disease-free survival. Conclusion: We present a novel, standardized approach for TP, DPD, and TS mRNA quantification in archival tissue specimens and applied this to a large series of primary colorectal tumors. Correlations to histopathological parameters and clinical follow-up revealed an association of TP, DPD and TS mRNA expression patterns with tumor stage and suggested new prognostic and predictive markers for patients with colorectal cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据