4.7 Article

Association of High Levels of Jagged-1 and Notch-1 Expression with Poor Prognosis in Head and Neck Cancer

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 17, 期 11, 页码 2976-2983

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1118-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council [96-2314-B-182A-026-My3]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [NMRPG 666012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the Jagged-1/Notch-1 expression in patients with head and neck carcinoma and to examine the possible role of the Jagged-1/Notch-1 signaling in tumorigenesis. Methods. lmmunohistochemical staining was performed on 59 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded head and neck carcinoma surgical specimens for Jagged-1 and Notch-1 expression. The head and neck cancer cell line, Fadu, with or without ectopic expression of the intracellular domain of Notch-1 (NICD) was also used for examining the tumorigenic capacity in vitro and in vivo. Results. The study included 59 patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 35-73 years). Patients harboring tumors with both high-level Jagged-1 (J1(Hi)) and high-level Notch-1 (N1(Hi)) had a worse overall survival than the patients only with J1(Hi) or N1(Hi) as well as the patients with low-level Jagged-1 and Notch-1 (J1(Lo)/N1(Lo)) (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate and the median survival time were 5% and 10.9 months for J1(Hi)/N1(Hi) patients, while they were 35.04% and 47.7 months for non-J1(Hi)/Ni-Hi patients. Ectopic expression of the active Notch-1 (NICD) in Fadu cells greatly enhanced cell migration and invasiveness in vitro and tumorigenic capacity in vivo. Conclusions. High-level coexpression of Jagged-1 and Notch-1 is associated with poor overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Constitutive activation of the Notch signaling, which is possibly initiated by the direct interaction between Jagged-1 and Notch-1 in head and neck cancer, confers tumor cells with a more aggressive phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据