4.8 Article

Cannibalism of live lymphocytes by human metastatic but not primary melanoma cells

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 66, 期 7, 页码 3629-3638

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3204

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phenomenon of cell cannibalism, which generally refers to the engulfment of Cells within other cells, was described in malignant tumors, but its biological significance is still largely unknown. in the present study, we investigated the occurrence, the in vivo relevance, and the underlying mechanisms of cannibalism in human melanoma. As first evidence, we observed that tumor cannibalism was clearly detectable in vivo in metastatic lesions of melanoma and often involved T cells, which could be found in a degraded state within tumor cells. Then, in vitro experiments confirmed that cannibalism of T cells was a property of metastatic melanoma cells but not. of primary melanoma cells. In particular, morphologic analyses, including time-lapse cinematography and electron microscopy, revealed a sequence of events, in which metastatic melanoma cells, were able to engulf and digest live autologous melanoma-specific CD8(+) T cells. Importantly, this cannibalistic activity significantly increased metastatic melanoma cell survival, particularly under starvation condition, supporting the evidence that tumor cells may use the eating of live lymphocytes as a way to feed in condition of low nutrient supply. The mechanism underlying cannibalism involved a complex framework, including lysosomal protease cathepsin 13 activity, caveolae formation, and ezrin cytoskeleton integrity and function. In conclusion, our study shows that human metastatic melanoma cells may cat live T cells, which are instead programmed to kill them, suggesting it novel mechanism of tumor immune escape. Moreover, our data suggest that cannibalism may represent a sort of feeding activity aimed at sustaining survival and progression of malignant tumor cells in an unfavorable microenvironment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据