4.7 Article

Dietary and lifestyle determinants of mammographic breast density. A longitudinal study in a Mediterranean population

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 118, 期 7, 页码 1782-1789

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21558

关键词

mammographic density; diet; longitudinal study; vegetables; reproductive history

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High mammographic breast density (H-MBD) has been associated with increased breast cancer (BC) risk, even after adjustment for established BC risk factors. Only a few studies have examined the influence of diet on MBD. In a longitudinal study in Florence, Italy, we identified about 2,000 women with a mamimgram taken 5 years after enrollment, when detailed information on dietary and lifestyle habits and anthropometric measurements had been collected. Original mammograms have been identified and retrieved (1,668; 83%), and MBD was assessed by 2 experienced readers, according to Wolfe's classification and a semiquantitative scale. By logistic analysis, we compared women with H-MBD (P2 + DY according to Wolfe's classification) with those with low-MBD (NI + PI). H-MBD was confirmed to be inversely associated with BMI, number of children and breast feeding, while it was directly associated with higher educational level, premenopausal status and a previous breast biopsy. In multivariate analyses adjusted for nondietary variables, H-MBD was inversely associated with increasing consumption of vegetables (p for trend = 0.005) and olive oil (p for trend = 0.04). An inverse association was also evident between H-MBD and frequent consumption of cheese and high intakes of P-carotene, vitamin C, calcium and potassium (p for trend <= 0.05). On the other hand, we found a positive association with increasing consumption of wine (p for trend = 0.01). This large longitudinal study, the first carried out in Mediterranean women, suggests that specific dietary components may play a key role in determining MBD in this population, thus possibly modulating BC risk. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据