4.4 Review

The relationship between the lactate turnpoint and the time at VO2max during a constant velocity run to exhaustion

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 278-282

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-865668

关键词

maximal oxygen uptake; running; time to exhaustion; training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present investigation examined the relationship between the running velocity at the lactate turnpoint (vLTP) and the time at which VO2max can be sustained (TVO2max) during a continuous run to exhaustion at the minimal running velocity that elicits VO2max (vVO(2max)). Seven moderately-trained endurance runners undertook three tests on a treadmill. The first test was to determine vVO(2max); the second to determine the time to exhaustion during a constant velocity run at vVO(2max) (T-lim vVO(2max)) and TVO2max; and the third to determine the vLTP. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine the association between the vLTP (%vVO(2max); i.e. the relative vLTP) and TVO2max, and between other selected physiological variables. Correlations between the relative vLTP and TVO2max, expressed as a percentage of T-lim vVO(2max) (the relative TVO2max; r = 0.82), and between T-VO2max and T-lim vVO(2max) (r = 0.89), were significant at the p < 0.05 level. All other correlations between selected measured physiological variables were found to be statistically insignificant. The main finding of this present study is that the relative vLTP demonstrated a significant positive correlation with the relative TVO2max. The physiological mechanism by which the lactate turnpoint may influence the relative TVO2max has not been elucidated, but may be due to a combination of decreasing the time to attain VO2max and increasing T-lim vVO(2max). The present investigation has demonstrated that the lactate turnpoint may influence the relative time at which VO2max can be sustained during a continuous run to exhaustion at vVO(2max), although further research is required to substantiate these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据