4.7 Review

Circulating cardiovascular disease risk factors and signaling in endothelial cell caveolae

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 31-41

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.01.025

关键词

caveolae; C-reactive protein; endothelium; estrogen; high density lipoprotein; nitric oxide

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL75473, HL58888] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD30276] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Caveolae are a subset of lipid rafts that are prevalent on the plasma membrane of endothelial cells. They compartmentalize signal transduction molecules which regulate multiple endothelial functions including the production of nitric oxide (NO) by the caveolae resident enzyme endothelial NO synthase (eNOS). Recent studies have demonstrated that circulating factors known to modify cardiovascular disease fisk regulate signaling in endothelial cell caveolae. In particular, high density lipoprotein (HDL) maintains the lipid environment in caveolae, thereby promoting the retention and function of eNOS in the domain, and it also causes direct activation of eNOS via scavenger receptor type BI (SR-BI)-induced kinase signaling. Estrogen binding to estrogen receptors (ER) in caveolae also activates eNOS, and this occurs through G protein and kinase activation. Discrete domains within SR-BI and ER mediating signal initiation in caveolae have been identified. Counteracting the promodulatory actions of HDL and estrogen, C-reactive protein (CRP) antagonizes eNOS through Fc gamma RIIB and PP2A, which dephosphorylates and inactivates the enzyme. The endothelial cell functions modified by these processes include the regulation of monocyte adhesion and endothelial cell migration. Thus, signaling events in caveolae invoked by known circulating cardiovascular disease risk factors have major impact on endothelial cell phenotypes of importance to cardiovascular health and disease. (c) 2006 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据