4.7 Article

A scoring system to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: A comparison with other scoring systems

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 2278-2286

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-9993-z

关键词

breast cancer; sentinel lymph node biopsy; axillary lymph node dissection; nonsentinel lymph node metastasis; prediction; scoring system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The majority of breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph node (SLN) do not harbor additional metastasis in non-SLN. It is unclear which patients with metastatic SLN require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of non-SLN metastasis and to develop a scoring system. Methods: The training dataset consisted of 184 breast cancer patients. The independent validation dataset consisted of 82 breast cancer patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the discriminative power of the scoring systems. Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that non-SLN status was predicted by preoperative ultrasonographic findings of the axilla, lymphovascular invasion, increasing tumor size, increasing number of metastatic SLN, and decreasing number of nonmetastatic SLN. Based on multivariate logistic regression, we developed a scoring system for predicting non-SLN metastasis. The AUC for our scoring system was superior to other published scoring systems when identical validation data were applied. Conclusion: The likelihood of metastatic non-SLN correlated with preoperative ultrasonographic findings of the axilla, increasing pathologic size of the primary tumor, presence of lymphovascular invasion, increasing number of metastatic SLN, and decreasing number of nonmetastatic SLN. Our scoring system appears to be effective and accurate for selecting patients for whom ALND can be avoided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据