4.7 Article

Immunohistochemical profiling based on Bcl-2, CD10 and MUMI expression improves risk stratification in patients with primary nodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 208, 期 5, 页码 714-723

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/path.1924

关键词

diffuse large B cell lymphoma; algorithm; stratification; international prognostic index; Bcl-2; CD10; MUM1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical outcome in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL) is poorly predictable. Expression of proteins related to germinal centre B (GCB) cell or activated B cells (ABC) and expression of apoptosis-regulating proteins Bcl-2 and XIAP have been found previously to be strongly associated with clinical outcome. In this study we aimed to develop an algorithm based on expression of GCB/ABC-related proteins CD10, Bcl-6 and MUM1 and apoptosis-inhibiting proteins Bcl-2, XIAP and cFLIP for optimal stratification of DLBCL patients into prognostically favourable and unfavourable groups. Expression of CD10 and cFLIP was associated with better overall survival (both p = 0.03), whereas expression of MUM1, Bcl-2 and XIAP was associated with poor clinical outcome (P = 0.01, p = 0.0007 and p = 0.03, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that Bcl-2 was the strongest prognostic marker followed by CD10 and MUM1. Stratification of patients according to a new algorithm based on expression of these three markers improved patient risk stratification into low and particularly high clinical risk groups (p = 0.04 and p < 0.0001, respectively). We conclude that, in our group of primary nodal DLBCLs, a new algorithm, based on expression of the apoptosis-inhibiting protein Bcl-2 and the GCB/ABC-related proteins CD10 and MUM1, strongly predicts outcome in International Prognostic Index (IPI)-low and -high patients. Its predictive power is stronger than previously published algorithms based on only GCB/ABC- or apoptosis-regulating proteins. Copyright (c) 2006 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据