4.6 Article

Centennial decline in the trophic level of an endangered seabird after fisheries decline

期刊

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 470-479

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00379.x

关键词

endangered species; Marbled Murrelet; marine food web; seabird diet; stable isotopes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coastal marine ecosystems worldwide have undergone such profound transformations from overfishing that trophic interactions observed today might be artifacts of these changes. We determined whether the trophic level of an endangered seabird, the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), has declined over the past 100 years after the collapse of Pacific sardine (Sardinops sadax) fisheries in the late 1940s and the recent declines of similar fisheries in central California. We compared stable-isotope signatures of delta N-15 and delta C-13 in feathers of museum specimens collected before fisheries decline with values in murrelet feathers collected recently. Values of delta N-15 in prebreeding diets declined significantly, 1.4 parts per thousand or 38% of a trophic level, over the past century during cool ocean conditions and by 0.5 parts per thousand during warm conditions, whereas postbreeding values of delta N-15 were nearly constant. The delta C-13 values in prebreeding diets declined by 0.8 parts per thousand, suggesting an increased importance of krill in modern compared with historic prebreeding diets, but postbreeding diets did not change. Stable-isotope mixing models indicated that the proportion of energetically superior, high-trophic-level prey declined strongly whereas energetically poor, low-trophic-level and midtrophic-level prey increased in the prebreeding diet in cool years when murrelet reproduction was likely to be high. Decreased prey resources have caused murrelets to fish further down on the food web, appear partly responsible for poor murrelet reproduction, and may have contributed to its listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据