4.7 Article

Lessons Learned From the Study of 10,000 Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 260, 期 3, 页码 416-422

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000869

关键词

database; soft tissue sarcoma; outcomes

类别

资金

  1. Soft Tissue Sarcoma [P01 CA047179-19]
  2. SPORE in Soft Tissue Sarcoma [P50 CA140146-04]
  3. KACF Kristen Ann Carr Fund
  4. Norman Morris Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objective: The management of rare tumors is difficult because of limited information on natural history. Our objective was to describe a long-term comprehensive prospective database with the assumption that with careful attention to patient, predisposing tumor and treatment variables, valuable knowledge could be obtained that could guide management. Methods: In July of 1982, we began a prospective database of all adult patients admitted to our institution for a surgical procedure for soft tissue sarcoma. Patients were included if they had primary, locally recurrent or metastatic disease undergoing a surgical procedure. Results: Over 3 decades, we entered 10,000 patients into our prospective soft tissue sarcoma database. Data were entered on a weekly or biweekly schedule with full participation of a multidisciplinary team and a dedicated sarcoma pathologist. Extensive information is available from this database. In this article, we describe distribution by site, histopathology, sex, size, and grade. We utilize this information along with outcome data for local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease specific, and overall survival. The value of molecular diagnosis is illustrated. Conclusions: Continuous prospective long-term databases are important to obtain knowledge particularly for rare tumors. Such data can be a rich resource for the development of prognostic indicators including nomograms and can be analyzed by Bayesian Belief Networks. These long-term data linked to collection of tumor and germ-line tissue at the time of an initial procedure will remain a resource for future decades.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据