4.5 Review

Genetics, transcriptomics, and proteomics of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 652-670

出版社

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.v67n0418

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [K01 AG024079-02, K01 AG024079-01A2, P30AG19610, P30 AG019610, K01 AG024079] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01MH057899, R01 MH057899] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To provide an updated overview of the methods used in genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies in Alzheimer's disease and to demonstrate the importance of those methods for the improvement of the current diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities. Data sources: MEDLINE-based search of 233 peer-reviewed articles published between 1975 and 2006. Data synthesis: Alzheimer's disease is a geneticaily heterogeneous disorder. Rare mutations in the amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 1, and presenilin 2 genes have shown the importance of the amyloid metabolism for its development. In addition, converging evidence from population-based genetic studies, gene expression studies, and protein profile studies in the brain and in the cerebrospinal fluid suggest the existence of several pathogenetic pathways such as amyloid precursor protein processing, P-amyloid degradation, tau phosphorylation, proteolysis, protein misfolding, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and lipid metabolism. Conclusions: The development of high-throughput genotyping methods and of elaborated statistical analyses will contribute to the identification of genetic risk profiles related to the development and course of this devastating disease. The integration of knowledge derived from genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies will greatly advance our understanding of the causes of Alzheimer's disease, improve our capability of establishing an early diagnosis, help define disease subgroups, and ultimately help to pave the road toward improved and tailored treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据