4.5 Article

Arginine 276 controls the directional preference of AKR1C9 (rat liver 3α- hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase) in human embryonic kidney 293 cells

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 147, 期 4, 页码 1591-1597

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2005-1141

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R21DK059942] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rat liver AKR1C9 is the best- studied 3 alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3 alpha HSD) of the aldo-keto reductase superfamily. The physiologic function of AKR1C9 is to catalyze the reduction of 5 alpha-androstane-17 beta-ol-3-one ( dihydrotestosterone) to 5 alpha-androstane- 3 alpha, 17 beta-diol ( androstanediol) rather than the reverse reaction, and all of the known AKR1C enzymes with 3 alpha HSD activity also preferentially catalyze dihydrotestosterone reduction in intact cells. Because the utilization of pyridinenucleotide cofactors NAD( P)( H) primarily governs the directional preference of HSD enzymes in intact cells, and because R276 participates in NADP( H) binding, we hypothesized that mutation of R276 would alter directional preference in intact cells. To test this model, we constructed stable lines of human embryonic kidney 293 cells expressing wild-type AKR1C9 and mutations R276M, R276G, and R276E. Mutations R276M and R276G retained reductive preference with slightly reduced magnitude compared with wild-type AKR1C9. NADPH depletion by glucose deprivation minimally altered the equilibrium steroid distribution for wild- typeAKR1C9but further reduced the reductive preference of mutations R276M and R276G. Mutation R276E, in contrast, showed an oxidative preference under all conditions. The intrinsic rates of the reductive and oxidative reactions for all four enzymes were similar at the functional equilibrium states. We conclude the R276 maximizes the reductive preference of AKR1C9 in intact cells and maintains this strong preference despite NADPH depletion; mutation R276E reverses the directional preference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据