4.5 Article

Analysis of porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells proteome by 2-DE and MS: Analytical and biological variability in the protein expression level and protein identification

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 S215-S225

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200500386

关键词

2-DE; MALDI-TOF-MS; MS/MS; Porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells; Variability

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [GEN2003-20658-CO5-03]
  2. Ramon y Cajal grant
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we present the protein map corresponding to the porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to better understand the role of these cells in the pig immune system. To conform the map, the proteins were separated by 2-DE using a 5-8 range pH gradient in IEF and approximately 800 spots were detected. Due to the high level of indeterminate variability associates to the 2-DE, analytical and biological variances were analyzed. The analytical variance was calculated for 50 proteins in three replicate 2-DE gels from the same protein extract whereas the biological variance was determined by comparison of the patterns obtained for the same 50 proteins in different animals. Values of 15.13 and 33.70% were determined for analytical and biological variances, respectively. These average variances will provide a quantified and statistical basis for future proteomic studies directed to evaluate relevant quantitative changes in the biological response. A representative set of the major proteins was subjected to MALDI-TOF analysis and over 75% of the proteins were identified on the basis of their similarity with its human homologue proteins. A large number of cytoskeletal and metabolic proteins were found as well as some proteins related to cell mobility and immunological functions. Finally, other proteins implicated in the cell signaling process, transport or apoptosis were also identified giving a wide overview of the porcine PBMC protein map.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据