4.7 Article

Ischemia-modified albumin increases after skeletal muscle ischemia during arthroscopic knee surgery

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 366, 期 1-2, 页码 264-268

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2005.10.020

关键词

albumin; cobalt binding test; skeletal muscle; ischemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ischemia can alter the ability of albumin to bind free metal atoms. Based on these biochemical changes, methods to quantify ischemia modified albumin (IMA) were developed to assist in the evaluation of patients with symptoms of cardiac ischemia. Since ischemia can occur in any vascular bed, the specificity of IMA for cardiac muscle ischemia is unclear and requires further investigation. Methods: We evaluated the specificity of an IMA test in patients with skeletal muscle ischemia during arthroscopic knee surgery. A pressurized thigh cuff was continuously inflated to 300 mm Hg on the operative leg, in order to arrest blood flow during the procedure. Samples were collected before surgery, 15 min after surgery, and prior to discharge. Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Median tourniquet time was 29 min (range 19-108). Median pre-operative IMA was 90.2 KU/I (range 77-101.6). Statistically significant (p < 0.05) increases in IMA and myoglobin concentrations, and decreases in albumin concentrations were observed following tourniquet release and before discharge. Conclusions: Post-operative myoglobin elevations indicated that skeletal muscle ischemia was sufficient to produce detectable myocyte necrosis. Post-operative IMA increases are consistent with ischemic modification of albumin during exposure to ischemic conditions in skeletal muscle during and/or immediately after tourniquet application. However, the negative correlations between IMA and albumin results suggest that increases in IMA were in part due to lower post-operative albumin concentrations resulting in decreased cobalt binding. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据