4.3 Article

Membrane integrity and development of immature murine cumulus-oocyte complexes following slow cooling to -60°C:: The effect of immediate rewarming, plunging into LN2 and two-controlled-rate-stage cooling

期刊

CRYOBIOLOGY
卷 52, 期 2, 页码 219-227

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.11.004

关键词

COC; cryopreservation; IVM; Me2SO; oocyte; slow-cool

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cryopreservation of murine germinal vesicle (GV) stage cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) has been shown to result in poor development and cumulus cell damage. In an attempt to determine the stage of the cryopreservation protocol at which damage occurs. three cooling profiles were compared: slow-cooling (0.3 degrees C/min) to -60 degrees C (protocol A); slow-cooling to -60 degrees C and plunging to - 196 degrees C (protocol B); or slow-cooling to -60 degrees C followed by further cooling at 10 degrees C/min to -150 degrees C, then plunging to -196 degrees C (protocol C). GV-stage COCs were collected from hormone-primed mice by repeated puncturing of ovarian follicles. COCs were exposed to 1.5 M Me,SO prior to cooling to -60 or - 196 degrees C. Membrane integrity was assessed immediately after thawing using carboxy fluorescein and propidium iodide. A greater proportion of cumulus cells were damaged following protocol B than protocol A. Damage was less extensive following protocol C than following protocol B. For assessment of development, COCs were matured and fertilised in vitro. Morphological normality was significantly reduced following cooling to -60 or - 196 degrees C compared with non-cryopreserved controls. Fertilisation of oocytes assessed as normal post-treatment was not significantly different between any of the groups. Development to blastocyst was least from oocytes exposed to protocol B, being significantly worse than for oocytes exposed to protocol A, but not significantly different to protocol C. A protocol comprising two stages of controlled-rate cooling decreased damage to the membranes of cumulus cells but did not significantly improve embryo development. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据