4.7 Article

Heterocyclic aromatic amines in domestically prepared chicken and fish from Singapore Chinese households

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 484-492

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.08.022

关键词

heterocyclic aromatic amines; food mutagens; Chinese diet; cooking method; marinating

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA55861] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chicken and fish samples prepared by 42 Singapore Chinese in their homes were obtained. Researchers were present to collect data on raw sample weight, cooking time, maximum cooking surface temperature, and cooked sample weight. Each participant prepared one pan-fried fish sample and two pan-fried chicken samples, one marinated, one not marinated. The cooked samples were analyzed for live heterocyclic aromatic amine (HAA) mutagens, including MeIQx (2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline); 4,8-DiMelQx (2-imino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline); 7,8-DiMelQx (2-amino-3,7,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline); PhIP (2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine), and IFP (2-amino-(1,6-dimethylfuro[3,2-e]imidazo[4,5-b])pyridine). A paired Student's t-test showed that marinated chicken had lower concentrations of PhIP (p < 0.05), but higher concentrations of MelQx (P < 0.05) and 4,8-DiMeIQx (p < 0.001) than non-marinated chicken, and also that weight loss due to cooking was less in marinated chicken than in non-marinated chicken (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the maximum cooking surface temperature was higher for fish than for either marinated or non-marinated chicken (p < 0.001), yet fish was lower in 4,8-DiMeIQx per gram than marinated or non-marinated chicken (p < 0.001), lower in PhIP than non-marinated chicken (p < 0.05), and lost less weight due to cooking than either marinated or non-marinated chicken (p < 0.001). Fish was also lower in MeIQx and 7,8-DiMelQx than marinated chickenl (p < 0.05). This study provides new information on HAA content in the Singapore Chinese diet. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据