4.7 Article

Operative Outcomes Beyond 30-day Mortality Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Oldest Old

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 253, 期 5, 页码 947-952

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318216f56e

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW)
  2. Ladies Cancer Research Center Endowment Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Resections for elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) are forecasted to grow, particularly in those beyond the age limit of screening (> 80 years). However, literature on operative outcomes after CRC procedures in the oldest old is focused primarily on operative mortality. We hypothesize that older age will additionally impact operative morbidity after CRC resections in a multihospital, risk-adjusted database. Study Design: We identified 19,375 patients > 40 years who underwent CRC procedures in the 2005 to 2008 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors were compared by age groups. Multivariable techniques were used to assess the effects of older age on operative outcome measures, adjusting for covariates. Results: Over 20% of our cohort was older than 80 years. Of those, 17% developed major complications and 29% experienced prolonged length of stay (LOS). Older patients also experienced higher rates of 30-day operative mortality (> 80 years vs. 45-55 years; 6% vs. < 1%), major complications (> 80 years vs. 45-55 years; 21% vs. 14%), and prolonged LOS after open (> 80 years vs. 45-55 years; 37% vs. 24%) and laparoscopic procedures (> 80 years vs. 45-55 years; 40.5% vs. 18%). These unadjusted comparisons persisted in multivariable analyses demonstrating that older age independently predicted worse operative outcomes after CRC procedures. Conclusions: The effects of older age extend to other important outcome measures after CRC procedures beyond operative mortality. As one of the largest multihospital studies, our study identified increased morbidity in the oldest old, a growing population. Our results should stimulate review of current policy and resource allocation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据