4.7 Article

Selective Diaphragm Muscle Weakness After Contractile Inactivity During Thoracic Surgery

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 254, 期 6, 页码 1044-1049

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318232e75b

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [VENI 016.096.043, VIDI 917.96.306]
  2. European Respiratory Society [MC 1120-2009]
  3. EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Postoperative pulmonary complications are significant contributors to morbidity in patients who have undergone upper abdominal, thoracic, or cardiac surgery. The pathophysiology of these complications might involve postoperative inspiratory muscle weakness. The nature of postoperative inspiratory muscle weakness is unknown. Objective: To investigate the effect of surgery on the functioning of the diaphragm, the main muscle of inspiration. Methods: Serial biopsies from the diaphragm and the latissimus dorsi muscle were obtained from 6 patients during thoracotomy for resection of a tumor in the right lung. Biopsies were taken as soon as the diaphragm had been exposed (t(0)) and again after 2 hours (t(2)). The contractile performance of demembranated muscle fibers, as well as fiber morphology and markers for proteolysis, was determined. Results: In all patients, the force-generating capacity of diaphragm muscle fibers at t(2) was significantly reduced (similar to 35%) compared with that at t(0), with a more pronounced force loss in type 2 fibers compared with type 1 fibers. Diaphragm weakness was not part of a generalized muscle weakness as contractile performance of latissimus dorsi fibers was preserved at t(2). Diaphragm fiber size and myofibrillar structure were not different at t(2) compared with t0, but myosin heavy chain type 2 was significantly reduced at t(2) and MuRF-1 mRNA and protein levels were elevated at t(2). Conclusions: Only 2 hours of thoracic surgery causes marked, and selective, diaphragm muscle fiber weakness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据