期刊
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 663-667出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdj137
关键词
irinotecan; etoposide; carboplatin; SCLC; extensive disease; phase II
类别
Background: Superiority of irinotecan/cisplatin over etoposide/cisplatin was suggested in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This trial investigated irinotecan/carboplatin (IP) versus etoposide/carboplatin (EP). Patients and methods: The interim analysis at the phase II/phase III transition point of the multicenter trial is reported. Extensive disease SCLC patients were randomized to receive carboplatin AUC 5 mg . min/ml either in combination with 50 mg/m(2) of irinotecan on days 1, 8 and 15 (IP) or with etoposide 140 mg/m(2) days 1-3 (EP). The primary end point was response rate and the secondary end points were toxicity and progression-free survival. Results: Seventy patients were randomized. Significant differences in grade 3 and 4 thrombopenia (17% IP versus 48% EP, P = 0.01) and neutropenia (26% IP versus 51% PE, P < 0.01) were found. Grade 3 and 4 diarrhea was more frequent with IP (18%) than with EP (6%) (P = 0.133). Response rates were 67% and 59% (P = 0.24) in the IP versus EP arm, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months (95% CI 7.1-10.9) in the IP arm and 6 months (95% CI 4.1-7.9) in the EP arm (P = 0.03). Conclusions: IP is active, less toxic and appears to improve PFS. Based on the phase II results the trial has been extended to phase III to assess the impact on overall survival.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据