4.2 Article

Magnetostratigraphy of borehole EY02-2 in the southern Yellow Sea and its paleoenvironmental significance

期刊

CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 855-865

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-006-0855-4

关键词

central Yellow Sea mud; rock magnetism and magnetostratigraphy; borehole EY02-2; M/B polarity boundary; magnetic susceptibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detailed rock magnetic and paleomagnetic studies have been undertaken on borehole EY02-2 (70m in length) in the southern Yellow Sea (SYS). The main Curie point revealed by magnetic susceptibility-temperature (k-T) curve is 580-600 degrees C indicating magnetite dominance. The hysteresis loop parameters show large variation of magnetic mineral size in different sedimentary contexts: it is larger in subtidal sediment than in terrigenous sediment and even larger than in shallow sea sediment. This trend is correlative with distance to sediment source and dynamic strength. Magnetostratigraphic results show that the M/B polarity boundary (MBPB) is at 63.29m and there are at least 7 polarity transitions (Nrl-7) in Brunhes chron that can be tentatively correlated with 6 named polarity reversals. Three positive polarity reversals occur in late Matuyama chron and the early two may be the record of Kamikatsura happening in 886 +/- 3 kaB.P. Magnetic susceptibility (MS) and sediment grain size behave so differently in some sedimentary facies that certain big environmental changes can be clearly revealed. Generally, the MS and grain size of subtidal and terrigenous sediments are larger than shallow sea sediments and MS value around 10x10(-5)Sl and mean grain size of 7 Phi seems to be indicators of shallow sea sediments of deep water depth. However, the frequently used excellent climatic proxies such as MS and grain size in loess and deep sea sediments fail to record such climatic cycles revealed by oxygen isotope in continental sea. The various sediment sources, sedimentation dynamic and their complex changes between glacial and interglacial periods should be the cause of failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据