4.4 Article

Noradrenergic modulation of activity in a vocal control nucleus in vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 95, 期 4, 页码 2265-2276

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00836.2005

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [F32 MH012344, MH-12344, MH-068530, R21 MH068530] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Norepinephrine ( NE) can profoundly modulate sensory processing, but its effect on motor function is less well understood. Birdsong is a learned behavior involving sensory and motor processes that are influenced by NE. A potential site of NE action is the robust nucleus of the arcopallium ( RA): RA receives noradrenergic inputs and has adrenergic receptors, and it is a sensorimotor area instrumental to song production. We hypothesized that NE modulates RA neurons, and as a first test, we examined the effect of NE on RA activity in vitro. We recorded spontaneous activity extracellularly from isolated RA neurons in brain slices made from adult male zebra finches. These neurons exhibited regular tonic activity with firing rates averaging 5.5 Hz. Bath application of NE rapidly and reversibly decreased firing for the majority of neurons, to the extent that spontaneous activity was often abolished. This was likely a direct effect on the cell recorded, because it occurred with blockade of fast excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission or of all synaptic transmission. The NE-induced suppression involved alpha 2-adrenergic receptors: yohimbine, an antagonist, completely reversed the suppression, and clonidine, an agonist, partially mimicked it. Perforated patch recordings revealed that NE induced a conductance increase in RA neurons; however, this did not prevent cells from firing when stimulated by afferents in HVC. For some neurons, NE application resulted in an increase in signal-to-noise ratio for spikes evoked by HVC stimulation. Thus NE could strongly modulate the spontaneous activity of RA cells, potentially enhancing signals relayed through RA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据