4.7 Article

Risk of Obesity-Related Cancer After Obesity Surgery in a Population-Based Cohort Study

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 252, 期 6, 页码 972-976

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e33778

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Obesity increases the risk of several cancers, but it is uncertain whether weight reduction is followed by any decreased risk. To address this topic, we selected a group of patients representing a substantial weight loss starting at a defined time, ie, patients submitted to obesity surgery. We hypothesized that risk of obesity-related cancer decreases with time after obesity surgery. Summary Background Data: A nationwide, population-based cohort study of obesity surgery in 1980-2006 as registered in the Swedish Patient Register. New cancers were identified through the Swedish Cancer Register. Cohort members' observed total number of overall obesity-related cancers and groups of obesity-related cancer (breast, prostate, colorectal, endome-trial, kidney) were divided by the expected numbers, representing the baseline risk, thus calculating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Time trends of SIR after obesity surgery were the main outcome measure. Results: Among a total of 13,123 obesity surgery patients, contributing with 125,049 person-years of follow-up, 296 new cases of obesity-related cancer were identified. There was no overall decrease in SIR of obesity-related cancer with increased time after obesity surgery (P for trend 0.40). Similarly, no statistically significant trends with follow-up time were found for cancer of the breast (P = 0.60), prostate (P = 0.34), endometrium (P = 0.83), or kidney (P = 0.42), while the risk of colorectal cancer increased with time (P for trend 0.01) after obesity surgery. Conclusions: The weight reduction following obesity surgery might not be entailed by a decreased risk of obesity-related cancer with increasing follow-up time as compared with the baseline risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据