4.8 Article

Sustained engraftment and tissue enzyme activity after liver cell transplantation for argininosuccinate lyase deficiency

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 130, 期 4, 页码 1317-1323

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.008

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Donor cell engraftment with expression of enzyme activity is the goal of liver cell transplantation for inborn errors of liver metabolism with a view to achieving sustained metabolic control. Methods: Sequential hepatic cell transplantations using male and female cells were performed in a 3.5-year-old girl with argininosuccinate lyase deficiency over a period of 5 months. Beside clinical, psychomotor, and metabolic follow-up, engraftment was analyzed in repeated liver biopsies (2.5, 5, 8, and 12 months after first infusion) by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the Y-chromosome and by measurement of tissue enzyme activity. Results: Metabolic control was achieved together with psychomotor catch-up, changing the clinical phenotype from a severe neonatal one to a moderate late-onset type. The child was no longer hospitalized and was able to attend normal school. Sustained engraftment of male donor liver cells was shown in repeated biopsies, reaching 19% at 8 months and 12.5% at the 12-month follow-up. XXYY tetraploid donor cells were mainly detected during the infusion period (2.5- and 5-month biopsies), whereas in the follow-up 8-month and 1-year biopsies, diploid donor cell subpopulations had become dominant. Moreover, argininosuccinate lyase activity, originally absent, became measurable in 2 different biopsy samples at 8 months, reaching 3% of control activity, indicating in situ metabolic effect and supporting the clinical evolution to a moderate form of the disease. Conclusions: Liver cell transplantation can achieve donor cell engraftment in humans in a significant proportion, leading to sustained metabolic and clinical control with psychomotor catch-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据