4.3 Article

Effect of hyperbaric oxygen on cardiac neural regulation in diabetic individuals with foot complications

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 360-366

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01798.x

关键词

autonomic neuropathy; clinical studies; diabetic foot; heart-rate monitoring; microvascular disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims There are relatively few effective methods to treat autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that hyperbaric oxygen therapy may restore cardiac neural regulation dysfunction in diabetic individuals with foot complications. Methods We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study inpatients with diabetic foot problems. Daily heart-rate variability analysis from 5-min electrocardiography was used to evaluate the temporal change of cardiac neural regulation. The experimental group consisted of 23 subjects exposed to hyperbaric oxygen therapy of 202.65 kPa for 90 min every Monday to Friday for 4 weeks (20 treatments). The control group consisted of 15 age-, sex- and disease-matched subjects who were not exposed to hyperbaric therapy. Patients with medical complications and failure of wound healing were excluded to eliminate possible confounding effects. Results There was no significant difference in baseline R-R interval (RR), variance, high-frequency power (HF), low-frequency power (LF), and LF/HF ratio between the two groups. In the hyperbaric oxygen group there were significant increases in changes of RR (82.7 +/- 16.02 ms); variance 0.88 +/- 0.12 ln(ms(2)); HF 1.06 +/- 0.18 ln(ms(2)); and LF 0.87 +/- 0.1.5 ln(ms(2)) after the treatment. Measurements of tissue oxygen demonstrated significant increases in local tissue oxygenation in the hyperbaric oxygen group (53.0 +/- 2.6 mmHg) compared with the control group (27.5 +/- 3.1 mmHg), P < 0.05. Conclusion Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has a significant vagotonic effect, which is beneficial in improving cardiac neural regulation in patients with diabetic autonomic dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据