4.6 Article

The functional evaluation of human peptide/histidine transporter 1 (hPHT1) in transiently transfected COS-7 cells

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 533-542

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2005.09.014

关键词

proton-dependent oligopeptide transporter; peptide/histidine transporter 1; PHT1; valacyclovir; COS-7; transient transfection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, the expression of the human peptide/histidine transporter (hPHT1, SLC15A4) mRNA was observed in the GI tract and in Caco-2 cells, suggesting that it may participate in the intestinal absorption of peptide-based agents. This study aims to elucidate the: (i) protein expression pattern of hPHT1 (SLC15A4) in human small intestine; (ii) cloning of the hPHT1 full-length sequence; (iii) functional characterization of hPHT1 in transiently transfected COS-7 cells. The expression of hPHT1 was measured using Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis. The hPHT1 full-sequence was amplified from BeWo cells, inserted into the pcDNA3.1-V5/His TOPO(R) plasmid and transiently transfected into COS-7 cells to investigate the uptake kinetics of [H-3]histidine and [H-3]camosine. Time, pH and sodium-dependent uptake studies were performed in mock (empty vector) and hPHT1-COS-7 cells. Results demonstrated hPHT1 protein expression in different intestinal regions. Histidine and camosine uptake was linear in hPHT1-COS-7 cells over 15 min and was found to be pH-dependent. These substrates and valacyclovir showed significantly higher uptake at pH 5.0 in the hPHT1 transients when contrasted to the mock COS-7 cells, whereas glycylsarcosine uptake was significantly lower and unaffected by pH. Other di- and tripeptides also showed affinity for hPHT1. This study presents the initial functional characterization, the protein expression of the hPHT1 transporter and provides insight into a potentially different route for increasing peptide and peptide-based drug transport. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据