4.6 Article

A hypothesis linking sodium and lithium reabsorption in the distal nephron

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 869-880

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfk029

关键词

amiloride; collecting duct; distal nephron; epithelial sodium channel; ENaC; lithium reabsorption; sodium reabsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. A hypothesis is proposed linking Na+ and Li+ reabsorption in the distal nephron. The handling of these two ions in the distal nephron is related because they share the same apical membrane entry mechanism: the amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel (ENaC). However, the two ions exit the cell through different transport mechanisms: Na+ via the Na+-K+-ATPase and Li+ via the Na+/H+ exchanger. Studies in rats have shown that under normal circumstances hardly any Li+ is reabsorbed in the distal nephron, so that the urinary excretion of Li+, expressed as a fraction of the delivery to the early distal tubule (FELi dist), amounts to approximately 0.97. In contrast, during severe dietary Na+ restriction, FELi dist decreases to 0.50-0.60. Our hypothesis is that the absence of distal Li+ reabsorption during intake of a normal diet can be explained by a negative driving force for Li+ entrance across the apical membrane in those segments in which ENaC is active. Method. We propose a model that incorporates this concept. Results. The model indicates that the lowering of FELi dist during dietary Na+ restriction can be explained by activation of apical ENaC in extra sub-segments further downstream. In these extra sub-segments the driving force for Li+ reabsorption is positive, leading to significant Li+ reabsorption. During dietary K+ restriction, FELi dist is reduced to 0.35-0.55. The model shows that this reduction in FELi dist can be explained by hyperpolarization of the apical membrane in ENaC-containing sub-segments, which is known to occur in this condition. Conclusion. We conclude that the model may improve current understanding of both Na+ and Li+ handling in the distal nephron.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据