4.3 Review

Genetic variants predisposing to cardiovascular disease

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 139-151

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mol.0000217895.67444.de

关键词

cardiovascular disease; environment; genetic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review The goal of this review is to provide an update on the most recent and relevant findings in the area of genotype-phenotype associations as well as the relationships between genetic factors and cardiovascular disease risk markers and events. In addition, emphasis will be placed on the methodological problems associated with studying the genetics of complex disorders, specifically cardiovascular diseases. Recent findings Genes associated with cardiovascular disease predisposition have been examined, including traditional cardiovascular disease candidate genes, such as ACE, AGT, eNOS, PON and MTHFR, new loci that have recently been added to the growing list of cardiovascular disease candidate genes (i.e. MEF2A, ALOX5, LTA, APOM, PDE4D), and genes that have been shown to be at the intersection of several age-related disorders through interaction with one another or with environmental factors (i.e. APOA5, APOE, PPARy, LPL and LIPC). Summary During the last year, tremendous effort has been made in elucidating new genes associated with cardiovascular disease predisposition. For the most part, however, major breakthroughs have not been made, primarily due to the poor replication of results among studies, as a consequence of poor experimental design. Nevertheless, we have increased our understanding of the complexity of cardiovascular disease and the relevance of gene-environment interactions as the ultimate drivers of the individual predisposition to the disease. It is essential, therefore, that present and future genetic studies in this area take into consideration the inclusion of high-quality environmental data in the analytical process to test the clinical usefulness of a genetic marker as a risk predictor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据