4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Survival prediction in patients with glioblastoma multiforme by human telomerase genetic variation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 1627-1632

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.0402

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-100264, CA-16672, CA-70917] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES-11740] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive glioma with the poorest survival. Use of biomarkers for screening patients with GBM may be used to modify treatments and improve outcomes. The level of human telomerase (hTERT) expression is an independent predictor of outcome of many cancers, and a functional variant of hTERT MNS16A (shorter tandem repeats or short [S] allele) is associated with increased hTERT expression. We investigated whether hTERT MNS16A variant genotype predicted survival in GBM patients. Patients and Methods We genotyped hTERT MNS16A in 299 1 patients using polymerase chain reaction and determined hTERTgenotype by classifying the DNA band of 243 or 272 base pairs (bp) as S allele and 302 or 333 bp as long (L) allele. We compared overall survival using Kaplan-Meier estimates and equality of survival distributions using the log-rank test, and we computed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the effects of selected variables. Results Overall survival differed significantly by hTERT MNS16A genotype, with median survivals of 25.1, 14.7, and 14.6 months for the SS, SL, and ILL genotypes, respectively. Compared with the SS genotype, the hazard ratios for the SL and LL genotypes were 1.69 and 1.87, respectively, after adjustment for other factors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed an independent statistically significant association between the hTERT MNS16A variant genotype and outcome. Conclusion A functional hTERT MNS16A genotype is a potential biomarker for assessment of survival outcome of GBM. Larger studies are needed to verify these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据