4.2 Article

The heterogeneity of human mesenchymal stem cell preparations -: Evidence from simultaneous analysis of proteomes and transcriptomes

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 536-548

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.01.002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) raise high hopes in clinical applications. However, the lack of common standards and a precise definition of MSC preparations remains a major obstacle in research and application of MSC. Whereas surface antigen markers have failed to precisely define this population, a combination of proteomic data and microarray data provides a new dimension for the definition of MSC preparations. Methods. In our continuing effort to characterize MSC, we have analyzed the differential transcriptome and proteome expression profiles of MSC preparations isolated from human bone marrow under two different expansion media (BM-MSC-M1 and BM-MSC-M2). Results. In proteomics, 136 protein spots were unambiguously identified by MALDI-TOF-MS and corresponding cDNA spots were selected on our Human Transcriptome cDNA Microarray. Combination of datasets; revealed a correlation in differential gene expression and protein expression of BM-MSC-M1 vs BM-MSC-M2. Genes involved in metabolism were more highly expressed in BM-MSC-M1, whereas genes involved in development, morphogenesis, extracellular matrix, and differentiation were more highly expressed in BM-MSC-M2. Interchanging culture conditions for 8 days revealed that differential expression was retained in several genes whereas it was altered in others. Conclusion. Our results have provided evidence that homogeneous BM-MSC preparations can reproducibly be isolated under standardized conditions, whereas culture conditions exert a prominent impact on transcriptome, proteome, and cellular organization of BM-MSC. (c) 2006 International Society for Experimental Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据