4.6 Article

Lipoxin A4 regulates bronchial epithelial cell responses to acid injury

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 168, 期 4, 页码 1064-1072

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051056

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL68669, R01 HL068669] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI0608084] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE016191, P50 DE016191] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aspiration of gastric acid commonly injures airway epithelium and, if severe, can lead to respiratory failure from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Recently, we identified cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-derived prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) and lipoxin A(4) (LXA(4)) as pivotal mediators in vivo for resolution of acid-initiated acute lung injury. To examine protective mechanisms for these mediators in the airway, we developed an in vitro model of acid injury by transiently exposing well-differentiated normal human bronchial epithelial cells to hydrochloric acid. Transmission electron microscopy revealed selective injury to superficial epithelial cells with disruption of cell attachments and cell shedding. The morphological features of injury were substantially resolved within 6 hours. Acid triggered and early marked increases in COX-2 expression and PGE(2) production, and acid-induced PGE2 significantly increased epithelial LXA(4) receptor (ALX) expression. LXA4 is generated in vivo during acute lung injury, and we observed that nanomolar quantities increased basal epithelial cell proliferation and potently blocked acid-triggered interleukin-6 release and neutrophil transmigration across well-differentiated normal human bronchial epithelial cells. Expression of recombinant human ALX in A549 airway epithelial cells uncovered ALX-dependent inhibition of cytokine release by LXA(4). Together, these findings indicate that injured bronchial epithelial cells up-regulate ALX in a COX-2-dependent manner to promote LXA(4)-mediated resolution of airway inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据